Check out the "issues" section. The point of SHAC, was to look at FACTS. Only then, could they begin to objectively look at what contributed to Sandy Hook. Over the course of 30 meetings, SHAC never had the complete facts. Proceeding beyond this point was negligence.
In this August interview, SHAC recognized lack of facts, what's changed?
"Jackson and other members have sought access to more information on Lanza before issuing a report...Jackson said his panel was waiting on a report from the Office of the Child Advocate, which he hoped provide the group with an accurate picture of the shooter...On Friday (March 6, 2015), Jackson said the panel never received the information it was seeking regarding Lanza and would release its final report without that information...some members said they would prefer not to finalize the report until more details about the shooter were released in the Child Advocate’s report...Jackson said ...the panel could try to get a timeline from the Child Advocate’s office and he was open to revising the commission’s report to include new information when it is released. ..Jackson told reporters it was time to start setting expectations for the report..."